Cinema and Brexit

The Politics of Popular English Film

Add to my list

by Neil Archer

Type: Essays
Subject: Countries > Great Britain
Keywords: Great Britain, 21st century
Publishing date: 2022
Publisher: Bloomsbury Academic
Collection: Cinema and Society
1st publishing: 2020
Language: English

Relative size

Physical desc.

Paperback • 300 pages
6 x 9 ¼ inches (15.5 x 23.5 cm)

ISBN

978-1-350-27434-1

User Ratings

(0 vote)

Average rating:

0	rating	= We can do without
0	rating	= Good book
0	rating	= Excellent book
0	rating	= Unique / a reference

Your rating: -

Report incorrect or incomplete information

Book Presentation:
Neil Archer’s original study makes a timely and politically-engaged intervention in debates about national cinema and national identity. Structured around key examples of ‘culturally English cinema’ in the years up to and following the UK’s 2016 vote to leave the European Union, Cinema and Brexit looks to make sense of the peculiarities and paradoxes marking this era of filmmaking. At the same time as providing a contextual and analytical reading of 21st century filmmaking in Britain, Archer raises critical questions about popular national cinema, and how Brexit has cast both light and shadow over this body of films. Central to Archer’s argument is the idea that Brexit represents not just a critical moment in how we will understand future film production, but also in how we will understand production of the recent past. Using as a point of departure the London Olympics opening ceremony of 2012, Cinema and Brexit considers the tensions inherent in a wide range of films, including Skyfall (2012), Dunkirk (2017), Their Finest (2017), Darkest Hour (2017), The Crown (Netflix, 2016), Paddington (2014), Paddington 2 (2017), Never Let Me Go (2011), Absolutely Fabulous: The Movie (2016), The Trip (2010), The Inbetweeners Movie (2011), Mr. Bean’s Holiday (2007), The World’s End (2013), Sightseers (2012), One Day (2011), Attack the Block (2011), King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) and The Kid Who Would be King (2019). Archer examines the complex national narratives and representations these films expound, situating his analyses within the broader commercial contexts of film production beyond Hollywood, highlighting the negotiations or contradictions at play between the industrial imperatives of contemporary films and the varied circumstances in which they are made. Considering some of the ways a popular and globally-minded English cinema is finding means to work alongside and through the contexts of Brexit, he questions what are the stakes for, and possibilities of, a global ‘culturally English cinema’ in 2019 and beyond.

About the Author:
Neil Archer is Senior Lecturer in Film at Keele University. He has published widely on British and other European film and television, as well as on Hollywood cinema, and is the author of seven books, including Cinema and Brexit: The Politics of Popular English Film (Bloomsbury, 2021).

Press Reviews:
"Through perceptive and nuanced analyses of a refreshingly wide and varied range of British films which, ostensibly, have nothing to do with Brexit, Neil Archer shows how certain forms of popular British cinema have worked to produce an historical imaginary of Britishness (and, in particular, Englishness) that embodies so many of the same cultural assumptions that led to Brexit. An extremely timely book, but also one which deserves a long life on British cinema bookshelves." ―Julian Petley, Professor, Brunel University London, UK

"This innovative, well-written, and carefully prepared book may thus be seen as an early intervention in the emerging field of Brexit studies." ―MEDIENwissenschaft

"Cinema & Brexit challenges renderings of the recent "zeitgeist" to offer an insightful analysis of "popular English cinema" within the globalised film industry. Whether discussing "very British blockbusters" like Bond or "culturally European" family films featuring Paddington, Cinema & Brexit takes a hard look at issues of soft power and 'soft' patriotism. Addressing inward-looking myths of resilience alongside inward investment from Hollywood, Neil Archer will change how you think about your favourite films." ―Matt Hills, Professor, University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

"Cinema and Brexit's detailed analysis of the films leading up the referendum and immediate years succeeding provides a keen insight into the thematic and industrial paradoxes now being unravelled." ―Dean Richards, Frames Cinema Journal

See the publisher website: Bloomsbury Academic

> From the same author: